Showing posts with label Ava DuVernay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ava DuVernay. Show all posts

Saturday, March 13, 2021

Relevant and Raw: 13th's Searing Depiction of Injustice

Movie Reviewed: 13th

Director: Ava DuVernay

Date Reviewed: 30 June 2020

jamesintexas Rating: ***1/2

The Thirteenth Amendment of The Constitution states, "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."  The emphasis is on "except as a punishment for crime," and that phrase contains the crux of the matter.  

In the aftermath of the George Floyd murder, protests occurring in cities big and small all over this country, and subsequent police brutality that shocks because it is fully aware of being filmed and does not seem to care, I finally watched Ava DuVernay's 13th, a searing documentary depiction of injustice that doubles as a history lesson that I never received.  It would have fit in the curriculum of my US History Seminar teacher's class during my junior year; instead of breadth, she emphasized depth with Howard Zinn's People's History as a seminal text, John Sayles's Matewan, a week-long reenactment of the My Lai massacre trial as well as the trial of George Pullman.  The course seems to run out of steam (and time), ending in the 60's-70's, glancing at Watergate (I think) and mentioning Reagan and the Clinton era (our time, circa 1994-1995).  DuVernay's work continues my unfinished education and brings in acclaimed authors and scholars like Bryan Stevenson, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Jelani Cobb, and Angela Davis and infuses the film with archival footage from Birth of a Nation to center the audience in the injustice.  In short, the Thirteenth Amendment includes a clause about slavery being abolished "except as punishment for crime," which funneled thousands of Black Americans into the prison systems on trumped up charges.  DuVernay's systematic unpacking of the cruel, unjust, abhorrent history of our nation's practices and its insidious legacy today is simultaneously horrifying and relevant.  From unpacking the codes of what is meant when a political operative recommends talking about "voters' rights" instead of outright racism to the rise of the prison-industrial complex from Presidents Reagan, Bush, and Clinton, the film's outrage is directed at the systems that were allowed to thrive and play on the fears of white America. 

Take the "Three Strikes and You're Out" rule from the 90's which included mandatory life sentences, effectively taking the decisions out of the hands of judges, removing sentencing discretion.  The film explains how the rise of the Democrats in 1992 with Clinton-Gore came with the emphasis on getting tough on crime and the authoring of the new crime bill.  That crime bill included brutal punishments that singled out Black and Brown offenders and crushed communities as a result, transforming families, schools, and industries as a result.  Recent documentaries such as this are causing me to unpack history that has occurred in my own lifetime, a weird thing to consider, but now that I am older than nearly all MLB and NFL players, it makes sense to see critiques of policy and history that I vaguely remember.  Even though I read the paper and we got Time Magazine at my house, I am woefully and demonstrably ignorant on so many matters.  The work continues.

There is no way to watch DuVernay's film and not be charged with action.  Like her work Selma, DuVernay offers a rich, layered examination at history and the idea of being an American that could not be more relevant in 2020 and beyond.  

Sunday, April 22, 2018

Movie Reviewed: A Wrinkle in Time

Director: Ava DuVernay

Date: 16 March 2018

jamesintexas rating: **

Related image

To cut to the heart of the matter, A Wrinkle in Time is not as strongly rendered or imagined as it could be, and some of the casting weighs the film down, as does some strange stalling of the momentum in an otherwise creative and beautiful film.  The film had an unbelievable build-up of anticipation from its filming to its previews, and it fails to soar as promised despite so many smart and creative people associated with it.  The film is just okay, and it is not one that I would return to.

A young girl named Meg (Storm Reid) loses her scientist father Mr. Murry (Chris Pine) to a strange time accident of sorts, and their family is bereft with young Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe) barely remembering him and her scientist mom Mrs. Murry (Gugu Mbatha-Rawa) dealing with her grief and loss.  Three Mrs. descend upon her, offering up oblique clues about her father's whereabouts and a message she has been sent from him.  Here is the film's major misstep.  I don't know if casting Reese Witherspoon, Mindy Kaling, and Oprah Winfrey plays as well as it could or should.  Witherspoon seems particularly off-key in her scenes, which just didn't work for me, and Oprah inhabits a gigantic character, towering above everyone one and somewhat aloof.  Kaling is a delight with some marvelous updates to her quotation-spouting Mrs. Who.  But, I don't know why it does not fully work.  I like the idea of traveling beautiful, strange worlds to see someone like Happy Medium (Zach Galifianakis), but instead of something Oz-like and wondrous, it kind of just loses its way, feels ho-hum, and never really fully gets off the ground.  Reid is fantastic here, but the visuals mixed with the trajectory of the story don't fully work for me. 

I did not read the novel as a child, but as an adult, I remember it being fully realized and powerful.  I do not know if the film collapsed under the weight of its own high expectations because Ava DuVernay is a tremendous director.  I recently revisited Selma with its undeniable power and assemblage of scenes building and building toward catharsis.  I think that thisfilm lost its way, and I wonder if the assemblage of talent and possibility and expectation did not bring out the best in this project.  Would a leaner, less starry A Wrinkle in Time have worked?  Maybe so.  Regardless, I am on board with Ava DuVernay, wherever she goes next, but I do not think this film is reflective of her power as an artist or a storyteller.