Sunday, April 22, 2018

It: Chapter One. Wow.

Movie Reviewed: It: Chapter One

Director: Andy Muschietti

Date: 22 April 2018

jamesintexas rating: ***1/2

Image result for It Film

There was a Missing Persons poster on the door to my daughter's school two weeks ago, and the straightforward terrifying proclamation of a loved child disappeared was completely chilling to me as a relatively new parent.  Movies have changed for me now that I am a dad.  I watch fewer of them, I might be more forgiving or less harsh towards their mistakes, but I think that horror films especially offer a new level of malevolence for me as a parent.  It is a revelation, not because it always steers this story in the right direction (often times, no), but it wins out because of its audacity and unsettling qualities, its burrowing into the sections of my brain that are attuned to this kind of scariness.  I watched It twice, turning it back on immediately after finishing it, but in full disclosure, I broke it up into multiple tiny pieces (15-20 minute chunks) which no doubt diluted its full effect but made it possible for me to finish.  Wow, this is rough stuff.

The Losers Club fight against an indescribable force of evil lurking in the mysterious sewers of Derry, Maine, a force that manifests itself as their deepest fears, often a clown named Pennywise who offers balloons from sewer grates before dragging a victim down to its lair.  The film has so many characters to introduce that it moves at breathtaking speed, as we might Bill (whose brother Georgie succumbs to the balloon trick in the opening scene), Beverly, Ben, Eddie, Mike, Richie, and Stanley, each with their very briefly defined character personality.  There simply is no time.  Derry is also haunted by the menace of the malevolent Henry Bowers (Nicholas Hamilton), who bullies and brutalizes with authority; I like to draw a line between him and Ace, Kiefer Sutherland's baddie from Stand By Me.  The Losers Club come together, rather quickly, as they realize what is happening to the town, and for the most part, we are off and running.  The film's running time (set against the book's epic thousand plus page scope, even when jettisoning the modern day stuff) means that it has to keep things moving, and in some ways, it really does.  Pennywise (Bill Skarsgard) appears frequently in many forms, often as frightening as a painting that chases you, a diseased transient near the spookiest old house ever (seriously: it looks like a house  straight out of Mordor), and even in a car driving by a violent scene as a red balloon floats gently to the rear ceiling.  It says a bunch about the film's power if it can wrench true terror from a slide show projector in a garage and a floating red balloon across a near-silent library.  The changing of forms is often a bit of stagecraft; a person will look away, and then It will be there.  Or, he will transform into the form of another character.  It delivers on the story's most terrifying image: Bev being haunted by voices from her sink.  The resulting deluge of blood is positively Kubrickian and breathtakingly terrifying its redness juxtaposed against the light above the spewing sink.  The film's signature set piece is not the sewers, like I thought; it is the creepy house with its doors and unseen menace.  There's a moment of pure body movement horror in Pennywise's emergence from a refrigerator is bone-chilling and unforgettable, and Muschietti wisely plays up the weirdness of Pennywise, his speech patterns, his references, and his gigantic forehead, plastered with white paint and orange tufts, demonic red lines that seem otherworldly and medieval.  The film goes too far and over-the-top only a few times, taking me out of the irrational horror of it, but I really admired its chilling moments.  It earns its R-rating.

Finn Wolfhard is the stand-out here as Richie Tozier, a profanity-spewing jerk of a thousand jokes who seems to be channeling the great Corey Feldman.  The rest of the cast does fine work with what they have.  The set design is pretty terrific too, as is the music and the make-up.  The scares are frequent and real.  I like the often twisted, tilting cinematography of Chung-hoon Chung.  In a darkened theater, this film must have been incredible.  There are a couple of musical cues that play up the late 80's nostalgia nicely.  It's flaws include a denouement that feels a bit off or light in consideration of the horrors of the moment.  There is some editing that suggests Henry Bowers has done some pretty heinous stuff to his friends, but maybe not?  And, I'm wondering where they go with Bowers' character because of some late changes to the story.  And speaking of changes to the story, the film commits to its R-rating, but it concisely tells the story without some of the major moments of the novel, and I'm not a purist who is ridiculous, but I think I'm just eager to see what other changes they will make because the story line is now significantly different and possibly less powerful.  The resulting 27 years will be rough ones for The Losers Club, as Pennywise will no doubt draw them back to Derry, but luckily, this film made so much money that is seems we will have to wait far less for Chapter Two.  What is a bit sad is that there is going to be a complete jettisoning of the cast because of the age jump, unless Muschietti commits to flashbacks.  I cannot imagine what horrors Bill Skarsgard will come up with for the second round.  He's pretty terrifying, though maybe because of my age and association with the novel and original miniseries, I think that I'm a Tim Curry guy, all the way. 

In closing, I think it is a bit unforgivable to deny Eddie Kaspbrak his pivotal moment with the inhaler, speaking for all asthmatics.  Not sure how they screwed that up. 

And, I'm said to note the passing of Harry Anderson, the adult Richie Tozier in the 1990 miniseries. 

Image result for It Film


Logan Rides into the Sunset

Movie Reviewed: Logan

Director: James Mangold

Date: 25 January 2018

jamesintexas rating: ***

Related image

I think that it gets stars just for cursing.  Logan, a neo-western in the guise of a comic-book film, is director James Mangold's updating of the dated, PG-13 formula, and it is a welcome breath of fresh air.  A grizzled, beat-down Logan (Hugh Jackman) shines in as scuzzy, messy, and lived-in a performance as you'll ever see in this type of universe.  Protecting Professor Xavier (Patrick Stewart, awesome as always) from those who would do him harm, he crosses path with a new, younger mutant, a version of himself many years ago in the form of Lara (Dafne Keen), mute but lethal, who is making a journey towards the Canadian border to find refuge.  Logan must make a decision to protect himself from bounty hunter Pierce (Boyd Holbrook) or make a run for it, against all odds.

Stephen Merchant, Richard E. Grant, and Eriq La Salle round out an excellent cast as supporting characters along the journey.  Some of the action sequences are delightfully wicked.  What fun this must have been for Hugh Jackman to do after many years of playing this character.  Its depiction of Logan as an Uber driver near the border in the near-future is inspired, and the film's constant nodding to the western genre is quite fun.  I found the ending to be a bit less inspired, but overall, the film delivers a thoughtful (at times) and fun end to a story that probably went on too long and didn't have enough great movies (I loved X-Men 2). 


Coco's Wonder.

Movie Reviewed: Coco

Director: Lee Unkrich and Adrian Molina

Date: 23 December 2017

jamesintexas rating: *** 1/2

Image result for coco the film

Coco wears its heart on its sleeve and builds a wondrous universe in its story of a young boy's negotiation with his relationship with his family and his ancestors in a small village in Mexico.  In post-Trump America, Coco's beauty shines even more brightly, especially considering that it is Pixar's first foray into telling a story with a Mexican protagonist, and its strong choices result in an emotional juggernaut with flourishes and artistic grace.

Coco's storytelling and textures build and build into graceful, moving shots of the spirit world visiting the world of the living.  It is surprising and warm, and Miguel's journey is one that I am excited to revisit again and again.  The film's music seems sure to earn the Oscar for Best Song (which it did!), and its undeniably tear-filled climax features "Remember Me" and the intersection of generations in a way that should appeal to everyone.

Miguel (Anthony Gonzalez) does not want to make shoes in his Mexican village per his family tradition.  Instead, he prefers to play guitar, idolizing the music of the great Ernesto de la Cruz (Benjamin Bratt) to the great consternation of Mama Imelda (Alanna Ubach) and the other elders of the family who have forbid music from their lives.  Miguel's devotion to his music and de la Cruz leads to steal de la Cruz's guitar and thus entering a portal into the land of the dead!  In robust, rich colors, Miguel searches for his hero amidst the borderlands of the dead and the living, a bridge where one may only cross provided that their photo is remembered on an ofrenda by a family member.  Miguel crosses paths with the wayward Hector (Gabriel Garcia Bernal), a guitarist in danger himself of being forgotten, and their alliance leads them to the doors of de la Cruz, a Gatsby-esque host of the undead, with lights, pools, music, and lavishness.  All the while, Miguel's ancestors search for him and hope to return him to the land of the living before he is permanently transformed.

Pixar's glorious attention to detail shines in the lingering shots of the Land of the Dead, with its floating castles and building, trains and skeletons, all set to a wondrous score.  I have watched this film many, many more times in finishing this review because my children love it so, and I think that the ideas behind so many of the scenes are just beautiful.  An adventure film with your own ancestors?  Alebrijes swooping from the sky in magical majesty?  The swirling sounds of "Poco Loco" as Miguel begins to find his voice?  And the powerful ending with its earned tears?  Coco delivers maximum entertainment and maximum heart.  The worst thing about it was the Olaf commercial/short film that ran before it.  Everything else was grand and nearly perfect.
Movie Reviewed: A Wrinkle in Time

Director: Ava DuVernay

Date: 16 March 2018

jamesintexas rating: **

Related image

To cut to the heart of the matter, A Wrinkle in Time is not as strongly rendered or imagined as it could be, and some of the casting weighs the film down, as does some strange stalling of the momentum in an otherwise creative and beautiful film.  The film had an unbelievable build-up of anticipation from its filming to its previews, and it fails to soar as promised despite so many smart and creative people associated with it.  The film is just okay, and it is not one that I would return to.

A young girl named Meg (Storm Reid) loses her scientist father Mr. Murry (Chris Pine) to a strange time accident of sorts, and their family is bereft with young Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe) barely remembering him and her scientist mom Mrs. Murry (Gugu Mbatha-Rawa) dealing with her grief and loss.  Three Mrs. descend upon her, offering up oblique clues about her father's whereabouts and a message she has been sent from him.  Here is the film's major misstep.  I don't know if casting Reese Witherspoon, Mindy Kaling, and Oprah Winfrey plays as well as it could or should.  Witherspoon seems particularly off-key in her scenes, which just didn't work for me, and Oprah inhabits a gigantic character, towering above everyone one and somewhat aloof.  Kaling is a delight with some marvelous updates to her quotation-spouting Mrs. Who.  But, I don't know why it does not fully work.  I like the idea of traveling beautiful, strange worlds to see someone like Happy Medium (Zach Galifianakis), but instead of something Oz-like and wondrous, it kind of just loses its way, feels ho-hum, and never really fully gets off the ground.  Reid is fantastic here, but the visuals mixed with the trajectory of the story don't fully work for me. 

I did not read the novel as a child, but as an adult, I remember it being fully realized and powerful.  I do not know if the film collapsed under the weight of its own high expectations because Ava DuVernay is a tremendous director.  I recently revisited Selma with its undeniable power and assemblage of scenes building and building toward catharsis.  I think that thisfilm lost its way, and I wonder if the assemblage of talent and possibility and expectation did not bring out the best in this project.  Would a leaner, less starry A Wrinkle in Time have worked?  Maybe so.  Regardless, I am on board with Ava DuVernay, wherever she goes next, but I do not think this film is reflective of her power as an artist or a storyteller.